Quantcast

Iconic Antagonist: Evil Wizards

Sep 12, 13 Iconic Antagonist: Evil Wizards

Second only to dragons, in terms of being labeled the “final boss” of a dungeon, is the evil wizard. These antagonists can be anything from conjurers and summoners, who call forth assistance from other worlds to hinder the players, to necromancers who have power over the dead, to illusionists and enchanters, who can alter a person’s perception of the world around them, to good old-fashioned evokers that will rain down spell-fire and hurl lightning bolts. The wizard is the most varied of enemies, just as it is the most varied of archetypes, because they are limited only by what magic they have to call upon. In many cases, this is hardly even a limit.

Gamemasters enjoy using the Evil Wizard trope because it allows them to have a “human” (or elf, or gnome, or whatever) enemy while still giving that enemy the power to do whatever they might want. This is an enemy that could have very easily been an ally, or even another player character, had things been different. It is far easier to sympathize with an antagonist you can understand than one that was born a powerful, supernatural being of destruction; like a dragon. At the same time, the addition of magic gives Gamemasters the ability to have that enemy perform whatever deeds they need them to in order to further the story. “How did the enemy burn the whole city to ash in a single night?” Magic. “We had him trapped, so how did he escape?” Magic. “How does the enemy keep getting more henchmen to throw at us?” Magic. Sure, in some ways this is a cop-out, but it works and not everything need be given such a simple explanation. Magic can be a Gamemaster’s tool for explaining what they do not have time to think up an explanation for. Do this too often, however, and your players are likely to grow irritated. Use with caution.

The evil wizard is also a great antagonist because, by default, wizards are quite intelligent. Think Sherlock intelligent. This is, in part, due to many games having the Intelligence/Logic attribute being linked to magic in some way. In D&D it determines the highest level spells you are able to cast. In Shadowrun, it determines how well Hermetic mages are able to resist Drain from their spells. In Anima, it determines how many spells you know. In short, wizards tend to be smart, and few things are more dangerous than an intelligent enemy. This allows Gamemasters to have the antagonist be able to reasonably determine what actions players will take and have then have contingencies without it feeling like the Gamemaster is being unfair.

The only real flaw to an evil wizard is that wizards, in most games, tend to be somewhat physically frail. One good hit from a fighter’s sword, and it’s all over. That makes the trick to running an evil wizard be diversion. The wizard cannot allow their enemies to get in close. This often means henchmen or various other sorts of obstructions. In short, they have to plan ahead and fight smart. Evil wizards can be a lot of fun to run, especially considering how much diversity exists within this antagonistic archetype. Their power and intellect is sure to make them a challenge for any group of wayward adventurers or stalwart heroes.

Image Credit: Thinkstock.com

Facebook Twitter Pinterest Plusone Digg Reddit Stumbleupon Email

About 

Joshua is a freelance writer, aspiring novelist, and avid table-top gamer who has been in love with the hobby ever since it was first introduced to him by a friend in 1996. Currently he acts as the Gamemaster in three separate games and is also a player in a fourth. When he is not busy rolling dice to save the world or destroying the hopes and dreams of his players, he is usually found either with his nose in a book or working on his own. He has degrees in English, Creative Writing, and Economics.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title="" rel=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>